PDA

View Full Version : The Ayers bull.


Ysobelle
10-10-2008, 04:36 PM
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/10/did_obama_lie_about_ayers.html


Obama and Ayers Friends?

ABOUT THE FACT CHECKER
"Comment is free, but facts are sacred." -- C.P. Scott, editor Manchester Guardian, 1921

Our goal is to shed as much light as possible on controversial claims and counter-claims involving important national issues and the records of the various presidential candidates.


CANDIDATE WATCH
Did Obama "lie" about Ayers?

"Obama's blind ambition. When convenient, he worked with terrorist Bill Ayers. When discovered, he lied. Obama. Blind ambition. Bad judgment."
McCain campaign video, October 10, 2008
A McCain campaign video released today hits the "guilt by association" theme that has become a prominent part of GOP attacks on Barack Obama during the final weeks of an increasingly vituperative presidential election campaign. It baldly accuses the Illinois senator of "lying" about his connection with Ayers, a former Weather Underground leader turned education professor. True or false?

The Facts

Bill Ayers has acknowledged that he was one of the leaders of a group known as the Weather Underground, which carried out a series of small-scale bombings at the Capitol and the Pentagon in 1970 and 1971 as a protest against the Vietnam War. He was charged with conspiracy to bomb, but the charges were dropped in 1974 because of prosecutorial misconduct. Over the last two decades, he has been better known in Chicago as an education expert, and it was in that role that he became acquainted with Obama in 1995. The two men served together on the board of an anti-poverty group, and Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's re-election campaign for the Illinois State Senate in 2001.

The McCain video--it does not appear to have aired anywhere as a commercial ad yet--says that Obama "worked with the terrorist Bill Ayers." A casual viewer might easily conclude that the connection between the two men dates back to the time when Ayers was involved in terrorist activities, which is not the case. As Obama frequently points out, he was eight years old when Ayers helped found the Weather Underground. The Illinois senator has repeatedly condemned the terrorist actions committed by Ayers and his fellow Weathermen.

Up until now, McCain has left the work of slamming Obama's "terrorist connection" to surrogates, particularly his running mate, Sarah Palin. Addressing a Florida campaign rally earlier this week, Palin depicted Obama as "someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who target their own country." McCain, by contrast, has preferred to raise questions about Obama's honesty and trustworthiness. Interviewed by Sean Hannity on Fox News on Thursday night, he said the following:

I think [Americans] should care about Senator Obama's truthfulness. I don't care much about an old terrorist and his wife who are still unrepentant...But the point is, it's not about them. It's about Senator Obama being candid and straightforward with the American people about their relationship. He has dismissed it by saying he was just a guy in the neighborhood. You know it's much more than that.
The claim that Obama "lied" about his relationship with Ayers rests on his response to a question from George Stephanopoulos of ABC News in a Democratic primary debate in Philadelphia on April 16. Invited to describe his relationship with Ayers, Obama played down its significance:

This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He's not somebody who I exchange ideas with on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn't make much sense, George.
That statement can certainly be read as an attempt by Obama to minimize his dealings with a controversial figure. But it is hard to qualify it as a "lie," despite the inaccurate statement about Ayers being a professor of English. (He is a professor of education at the University of Illinois.) The New York Times got it right last week when it noted that the Illinois senator had "played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers."


The Pinocchio Test

The McCain campaign is distorting the Obama-Ayers relationship, and exaggerating their closeness. There is no evidence that Obama has "lied" about his dealings with Ayers. It would be more accurate to say that he "told the truth slowly," a regrettable but commonplace practice among politicians seeking to avoid embarrassing questions.

lavender r dragon
10-10-2008, 06:50 PM
The two men served together on the board of an anti-poverty group, and Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's re-election campaign for the Illinois State Senate in 2001.

<snip>
invited to describe his relationship with Ayers, Obama played down its significance:

This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. <snip> despite the inaccurate statement about Ayers being a professor of English. (He is a professor of education at the University of Illinois.)

a) just b/c they guy gave him money, doesn't make him a close personal friend and advisor. lots of people have given obama, and mccain for that matter, money...and some, i expect, more than $200 and they're not all campaign advisors...mrs.hilton for example, lol.

b) obama didn't even know what he was a professor of? and the mccain campaign is calling them close personal friends - or maybe it was a slip of the tongue - like "my fellow prisioners":wink:

Ysobelle
10-14-2008, 10:00 AM
Because the story refuses to die:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-zorn-14-oct14,0,4194430.column

McCain's Ayers isn't the one known here
If he was a terrorist in '90s, we missed it

Eric Zorn | Change of Subject
October 14, 2008


Mike Royko thought Bill Ayers was a jerk.

In November 1990 the late Tribune columnist reflected mockingly on Ayers' days as "flaming radical leader" of a fringe group opposed to the Vietnam War and his transition to "useful citizen."

"With all forgiven," Royko wrote, the former radicals "have rejoined society. … [Ayers is] now working for a good cause, improving public education. He's become a leader in the so-called school reform program."

In July 1993, then, the Tribune reported that Royko made nice with Ayers and his wife at a party. "I thought, 'Wow, she's a good-looking chick,' " Royko said about Ayers' wife, Bernardine Dohrn, also a former radical. "Anyway, she was pleasant."

These are only two of about 60 references to Ayers in the 1990s I found in local news archives available on Nexis. Some of them make reference to his unseemly past—it was no secret—but most do not.

He was publishing books on education, helping lead a charge to get grant money for school reform and being honored as Chicago's Citizen of the Year in 1997.

Today, some say this was an outrage. Ayers should have been shunned and marginalized, loudly criticized, not embraced, by the city's political and academic establishment.

But the record shows he just wasn't a very controversial figure. Aside from Royko's "I still think he's a jerk" column in 1990, I found only two objections to Ayers' civic rehabilitation in the decade's news archives: a 1993 letter to the Tribune and a 1999 guest commentary.

If there were protests or organized efforts opposing Ayers, the papers didn't cover them. If any of Mayor Richard M. Daley's feckless opponents tried to use his approval of Ayers as an issue in the 1990s, I can find no evidence of it. And if any of the pillars of society who helped oversee the Chicago Annenberg Challenge education grants ever resigned or otherwise tried to distance themselves from Ayers, who played a key role in securing that grants, the available historical record is silent on the matter.

Revisionist history being promoted by Republican John McCain's presidential campaign is that Democrat Barack Obama "worked with terrorist Bill Ayers" when Obama chaired the Chicago Annenberg board, whose meetings Ayers attended, and served with him on another board. And that it revealed a shocking lack of judgment when Obama allowed Ayers and Dohrn to host a meet-and-greet coffee for him when he was launching his political career in the mid-1990s.

Note the implicit present tense in this and other attacks on Obama. Not "former," not "one-time," but now: "Ayers is a terrorist," as one commentator in this newspaper put it the other day, amplifying vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's charge that Obama is "palling around with terrorists."

Neither Ayers nor his wife was espousing or practicing terrorist acts in the 1990s when Obama met them. They haven't committed or advocated violent protest since the early 1970s.

If Ayers is a terrorist, then McCain is an adulterer and I am a 6th grader.

Perhaps history will one day judge harshly all of those who participated in educational reform efforts or other civic projects in which Ayers was involved. This will include former University of Illinois and Northwestern University presidents; top honchos at Ameritech, Continental Bank and the Field Museum; and even the former publisher of the Tribune.

Maybe the legacy of Royko will be forever stained because he used such a mild epithet to describe Ayers and ogled Dohrn instead of denouncing and renouncing her on the spot.

Somehow, though, I expect history will be smarter than that.



ericzorn@gmail.com

Cyranno DeBoberac
10-14-2008, 11:59 PM
Considering that McCain has a much more solid record of "paling around" with G. Gordon Liddy (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mccain+gordon+liddy&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=mccain+gordon+lidd) than Obama does with Ayers, maybe McCain should shut the fuck up.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0504chapmanmay04,0,6238795.column

What McCain didn't mention is that he has his own Bill Ayers -- in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.

How close are McCain and Liddy? At least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy's home was the site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator's campaigns -- including $1,000 this year.

Last November, McCain went on his radio show. Liddy greeted him as "an old friend," and McCain sounded like one. "I'm proud of you, I'm proud of your family," he gushed. "It's always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great."

Which principles would those be? The ones that told Liddy it was fine to break into the office of the Democratic National Committee to plant bugs and photograph documents? The ones that made him propose to kidnap anti-war activists so they couldn't disrupt the 1972 Republican National Convention? The ones that inspired him to plan the murder (never carried out) of an unfriendly newspaper columnist?

Liddy was in the thick of the biggest political scandal in American history -- and one of the greatest threats to the rule of law. He has said he has no regrets about what he did, insisting that he went to jail as "a prisoner of war."

All this may sound like ancient history. But it's from the same era as the bombings Ayers helped carry out as a member of the Weather Underground. And Liddy's penchant for extreme solutions has not abated.

In 1994, after the disastrous federal raid on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, he gave some advice to his listeners: "Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they're going to be wearing bulletproof vests. ... Kill the sons of bitches."

He later backed off, saying he meant merely that people should defend themselves if federal agents came with guns blazing. But his amended guidance was not exactly conciliatory: Liddy also said he should have recommended shots to the groin instead of the head. If that wasn't enough to inflame any nut cases, he mentioned labeling targets "Bill" and "Hillary" when he practiced shooting.

Given Liddy's record, it's hard to see why McCain would touch him with a 10-foot pole. On the contrary, he should be returning his donations and shunning his show. Yet the senator shows no qualms about associating with Liddy -- or celebrating his service to their common cause.

How does McCain explain his howling hypocrisy on the subject? He doesn't. I made repeated inquiries to his campaign aides, which they refused to acknowledge, much less answer. On this topic, the pilot of the Straight Talk Express would rather stay parked in the garage.

That's an odd policy for someone who is so forthright about his rival's responsibility. McCain thinks Obama should apologize for associating with a criminal extremist. To which Obama might reply: After you.