PDA

View Full Version : Controversy over PBS show about lesbian family


Susie Sweetz
01-27-2005, 10:33 AM
Jan 25, 2005
Education Secretary Condemns Public Show With Gay Characters
By Ben Feller
The Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) - The nation's new education secretary denounced PBS on Tuesday for spending public money on a cartoon with lesbian characters, saying many parents would not want children exposed to such lifestyles.

The not-yet-aired episode of "Postcards From Buster" shows the title character, an animated bunny named Buster, on a trip to Vermont - a state known for recognizing same-sex civil unions. The episode features two lesbian couples, although the focus is on farm life and maple sugaring.

A PBS spokesman said late Tuesday that the nonprofit network has decided not to distribute the episode, called "Sugartime!," to its 349 stations. She said the Education Department's objections were not a factor in that decision.

"Ultimately, our decision was based on the fact that we recognize this is a sensitive issue, and we wanted to make sure that parents had an opportunity to introduce this subject to their children in their own time," said Lea Sloan, vice president of media relations at PBS.

However, the Boston public television station that produces the show, WGBH, does plan to make the "Sugartime!" episode available to other stations. WGBH also plans to air the episode on March 23, Sloan said.

PBS gets money for the "Postcards from Buster" series through the federal Ready-To-Learn program, one aimed at helping young children learn through television.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said the "Sugartime!" episode does not fulfill the intent Congress had in mind for programming. By law, she said, any funded shows must give top attention to "research-based educational objectives, content and materials."

"Many parents would not want their young children exposed to the lifestyles portrayed in the episode," Spellings wrote in a letter sent Tuesday to Pat Mitchell, president and chief executive officer of PBS.

"Congress' and the Department's purpose in funding this programming certainly was not to introduce this kind of subject matter to children, particularly through the powerful and intimate medium of television."

She asked PBS to consider refunding the money it spent on the episode.

With her letter, Spellings has made criticism of the publicly funded program's depiction of the gay lifestyle one of her first acts as secretary. She began on Monday, replacing Rod Paige as President Bush's education chief.

Spellings issued three requests to PBS.

She asked that her department's seal or any statement linking the department to the show be removed. She asked PBS to notify its member stations of the nature of show so they could review it before airing it. And she asked for the refund "in the interest of avoiding embroiling the Ready-To-Learn program in a controversy that will only hurt" it.

In closing, she warned: "You can be assured that in the future the department will be more clear as to its expectations for any future programming that it funds."

The department has awarded nearly $99 million to PBS through the program over the last five years in a contract that expires in September, said department spokesman Susan Aspey. That money went to the production of "Postcards From Buster," and another animated children's show, and to promotion of those shows in local communities, she said.

The show about Buster also gets funding from other sources.

In the show, Buster carries a digital video camera and explores regions, activities and people of different backgrounds and religions.

On the episode in question, "The fact that there is a family structure that is objectionable to the Department of Education is not at all the focus of the show, nor is it addressed in the show," said Sloan of PBS.

But she also said: "The department's concerns align very closely with PBS' concerns, and for that reason, it was decided that PBS will not be providing the episode." Stations will receive a new episode, she said.

--

Susie Sweetz
01-27-2005, 10:37 AM
My opinion on the above matter is that parents can decide if they want their children to view this episode. I have seen the show but NOT the episode. The show takes children into a day of a variety of families:a large Mormon family, a Jewish family before & a bat mitzvah, a farming family in the west etc.

What do you think?

Drea Beth
01-27-2005, 10:56 AM
My opinion on the above matter is that parents can decide if they want their children to view this episode. I have seen the show but NOT the episode. The show takes children into a day of a variety of families:a large Mormon family, a Jewish family before & a bat mitzvah, a farming family in the west etc.

What do you think?

Is this Arthur's friend Buster? I've never seen the show, since my "little one" is well past the target age, but I think it sounds cool.

My personal opinion is that most kids won't even notice or think twice about seeing a two mom family. If parents are uncomfortable with the content, so be it -- to each their own. I don't agree, but then again, I'm very liberal for a conservative! :star:

Susie Sweetz
01-27-2005, 11:22 AM
Yes Arthur's best friend Buster now has his own show. Buster's dad is a pilot and takes Buster with him over the Summer and leaves him in the care of various families around the country for a day. The day is video taped and sent back to Arthur or other charcters from Arthur.

I agree that most kids won't even notice.

Nevada
01-27-2005, 12:32 PM
it's called the off button---if they don't want their kids to see anything on the tv...shut the thing off....PBS stands for PUBLIC broadcast station and last time I checked the Gays and Lesbians are part of the tax paying public....part of the federal tax money she wants refunded was in part paid for by the taxes all of the people have paid..not just the straights....sorry for the rant...it's a sore point....I hate to see my friends and all that are being putdown and treated as less than equal citizens just because of their sexual orientation.....but damn..the govt sure wants their money dont they? just doesnt want them to have an equal voice...say isnt that one of the main reasons we had that lovely revolution? equal representation?

Dmitri
01-27-2005, 01:07 PM
I would TOTALLY let my little girl watch this... Not sure if her mom would approve, but that's not the point. Giving kids the exposure to differences, in harmless ways, encourages questions. Questions lead to learning... Learning leads to... OMG!!!!

Free thinking... :shock:

daBaroness
01-27-2005, 02:14 PM
I agree - most kids won't notice. Furthermore - I don't know a whole lot of fundamentalist or conservative types who regularly tune into PBS anyway - they tend to see it as a the wildly liberal media full of whackos, sickos and perverts. They certainlly don't want their children watching anything as subversive as Sesame Street (snerk).

But PBS does carry some programming that will upset the sensibilities of more conservative types - particularly shows like "In the Life" hosted by Harvey Fierstein. It's a news magazine about interesting people who happen to be gay or lesbian and is absolutely targeted at the GLBT community. I love the show personally - it's very engaging, entertaining and informative.

Course - I don't have a homophobic bone in my body and have no religious conflict where accepting and loving any of God's children is concerned. Like everything else - I think the government needs to get out of our homes and particularly out of our bedrooms The fact is, whether people like it or not, gay people have always and will always be a part of our populations. Alexander the Great, Socrates, Leonardo di Vinci, Sir Francis Bacon - just a very short list of historical characters who were gay.

Contrary to the popular belief of some people - GLBT do not "recruit" young people or children in to the "gay lifestyle." You'e either gay or not - there's no way to recruit someone to change their sexual preference - the notion is obsurd! But it's been used as a fear tactic by religious and political conservatives to perpetuate their own power and agendas.

This is just the latest example of the same group to keep basically decent people within their sphere of influence. It's the classic divide and conquer tactic - and nothing works better to keep groups from uniting than conjuring and perpetuating fear and mistrust between them - inventing a scapegoat group. The Nazi's did it quite successfully. We in the United States are masters at it - settlers vs. natives, blacks vs. whites, hispanics vs. asians, Catholics vs. protestants ... I know I'm nauseated!

Yep - this is just another attempt to keep us afraid of the differences between people rather than celebrating our diversity and our freedom to be different than our neighbor - brought to you by the same people who insist Tinky-winky and Spongebob Squarepants' best friend Patrick are the gay recruiters of the young. Personally I always suspected Professor Peabody, but maybe my gaydar is on the fritz. :rotfl:

Enough already! Problem is there are still a lot of people out there who abandon their own sensibilities and convictions and give into the manure these true evil-doers are spreading. Shame on them!!!

Alianne
01-27-2005, 06:25 PM
Y'know, unless they're smearing maple syrup over each other's bodies and going at it on camera, it ain't nobody's business.

Sheesh.

Galleywench
01-27-2005, 11:16 PM
I would hope that the kids do notice...and take note that a family is a family and need not be the male daddy, female mommy and various siblings and grandma baking cookies. We shelter our children from things that we feel they need to be protected from, drugs, violence, gratuitous sex...and I am sure that many folks would argue that homosexual civil unions would fall under the ticket to hell in a handbasket category...but don't we have enough narrow minded people in the world? Let them know that all families are not made from the same mold and just because sally has two mommy's doesn't make them any less a family.

If you've read my LJ you know that we have a female couple living in the apartment upstairs. You also know that my ex husband is a Roman catholic neanderthal bigot. Megan my 13 year old knows that the girls upstairs are lesbians. Caitlin the 9 year old does not. We have not told either child what the situation is, Meg was simply able to put 2 and 2 together. She noticed. And the last time I checked she was still a heterosexual (although her father would prefer that she supress ALL urges forever lol).

Mistress Morigianna
01-29-2005, 02:55 AM
education-
last time i looked (maybe just here in califonia?) pretty much every state and city has at least a few gay & lesbian couples.....

It used to be taboo to show a divored mom on tv.
mary from mary tyler more was originally supposed to be divorced but the network decided a 'broken engagement" was better.

Now you see lots of familes on tv, just like in the real world- everything from several familes in one house, to divorced families & relitives, adopted children. mixed couples,
we have will & grace and ellen
how long till family comedies or dramas with gay or lesbian couples? I'ts already on cable.

Cyranno DeBoberac
01-31-2005, 12:59 PM
[...]unless they're smearing maple syrup over each other's bodies and going at it on camera[...]

Highest Rated Show Ever.