PDA

View Full Version : McCheesed off


Katerinka Kotenoka
07-12-2005, 11:03 PM
Australian lawyer McCheesed off with fast-food giant

SYDNEY (AFP) - An Australian lawyer fired back with a lawsuit against McDonald's here after the fast-food giant blocked him for registering his nickname as a trademark.

Malcolm McBratney vowed not to back down in the battle that erupted earlier this year, when McDonald's took exception to his use of "McBrat" on the uniforms of a local rugby team.

"What it boils down to is that McDonald's seems to be trying to own not only the McDonald name but everything beginning with Mc," said McBratney, who is a specialist in intellectual property rights.

"There are a lot of people with Irish and Scottish heritage who'd dispute that, including me, and I'm prepared to take them on."

McDonald's Australia spokeswoman Kristene Mullen denied the burger giant was trying to monopolise the "Mc" prefix.

"McDonald's is like any company with intellectual property it wants to protect," Mullen told AFP. "We want to protect our investment, our image and our brand."

McBratney sponsored the Brisbane Irish rugby union team, which adopted the McBrat tag on the back of their shorts because they claimed his full name would not fit.

The company objected that McBrat could be confused with McKids. Mullen said that toys with the McKids logo had been on sale in retail outlets since earlier this year.

But McBratney said a trademark could be challenged in Australia if it had not been used for more than three years, and that McKids had been dormant since it was registered in 1987. His suit seeks to de-register McKids.

"I think it smacks of corporate arrogance that even though McDonald's is not using the McKids trademark in Australia, it still thinks it can block the registration of a separate trademark that has nothing to do with its business," McBratney said.

The Brisbane team is boycotting the chain, once a favourite haunt, in a full show of McSupport.

"Our team, with its Irish heritage, has many Mcs in it and they are all outraged," team spokesman Shane Quinn said. He said the company "really have got to be McKidding."

Drea Beth
07-13-2005, 08:27 AM
You didn't give an option for anyone who agrees that McD's has the right to try and defend their intellectual property...

While I think they have gotten waaayyyy carried away with the whole "Mc" everything, as a corporation it is their responsibility to look out for their interests and the interests of their stockholders. One of those interests is trademarks and other intellectual property.

That said, in this case where they trademark they're going after is a play on an individual's name, I hope they get their arses handed to them by the courts.

Eric McTavish
07-13-2005, 08:34 AM
They tried this in Scotland about 4 or 5 years ago with a tea shop Called McMuffin (owned by a McDonald no less) well they slapped her with a C&D order and all so se went to the Lord McDonald who threatened them back with with pulling the useage of the name McDonalds in Scotland, and anywhere else name rights laws would allow it (seeing as they have rights to the name going much farther back thean any fast food chain) The tea shop is still there and still called McMuffins,

WenchLadyKate
07-13-2005, 11:35 AM
Isn't this alot like Spike Lee suing Spike TV for using his name? Spike TV is still on the air as Spike TV, by the way. I could see it if his name didn't start with Mc, but come on people! Lighten up! AND kill the clown, clowns are creepy.

Katerinka Kotenoka
07-13-2005, 11:55 AM
Actually I had two other options on the poll but they didn't come out on the post. *shrug* Oh well. They may be a trademark, but they didn't invent the name. Besides I knew Eric would get a kick out of this one.. he doesn't like McDonalds that much.

Mum Tarts
07-13-2005, 02:04 PM
I think we know why too!! :roll:

Mairi the Herbwench
07-13-2005, 02:10 PM
Being a McKinley, McDonalds is no more special than I am - just much richer!

daBaroness
07-13-2005, 02:33 PM
What a load of McBull!

Jessa
07-13-2005, 02:38 PM
The funniest part is that their claim is based on the concern that people will confuse McBrat with McKids! That doesn't sound like that kind of positive image they want for their brand. :rotfl: